If your company uses AI, it already has something to govern.
The world's first certifiable artificial intelligence management system. It applies whether you develop models or only use third-party AI.
start with the AI system inventory- Your role towards each AI system: you develop it, provide it or use it
- AI system inventory, including AI embedded in purchased software
- Clause 6.1.4: impact assessment on people and society (ISO/IEC 42005 guidance)
- Annex A: 38 controls in 9 domains, different from those of 27001
Clauses 4 to 10 are the same across the four standards; this is what goes on top.
Where the standard stands today.
Status of the standard · October 2026
| Document | Status | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| ISO/IEC 42001:2023 | Current and certifiable | First edition and only auditable version. The world's first AI management system. |
| ISO/IEC 42005:2025 | Guidance | Guidance for the AI system impact assessment required by clause 6.1.4. |
| ISO/IEC 42006:2025 | Guidance | Requirements for bodies that certify an AIMS. |
| EN ISO/IEC 42001:2026 | European adoption | The same 2023 text adopted as a European standard; it is not a revision. |
It also applies if you only use third-party AI
Field noteThe underlying misunderstanding is believing ISO 42001 is for those who train models. The first step is identifying your role towards each AI system (you develop it, provide it or use it) and the controls change radically with the answer.
A company consuming a third party's language model does not manage the same things as the one training it, but it does have obligations: responsible use, information to interested parties and supplier management. And it needs something almost nobody has: an inventory of AI systems, including the AI embedded in software it already bought without noticing.
The requirement that exists in no other standard
Clause 6.1.4, AI system impact assessment, has no equivalent in 9001, 27001 or 27701. And it is constantly confused with the risk assessment of 6.1.2. They are two different exercises and both are mandatory: 6.1.2 looks at what can go wrong for the organization; 6.1.4 looks at the consequences the system has for people, groups and society.
That second exercise is the one an auditor will scrutinize, because it is the standard's reason for being. The guidance for it is ISO/IEC 42005:2025.
Certifying is not complying with the EU AI Act
Worth being clear on before investing. ISO 42001 helps you comply with the European AI regulation, but it is not a harmonized standard and gives no presumption of conformity. The AI Act has its own obligations (prohibitions, high-risk regime, transparency duties) with fines of up to 35 million euros or 7% of global turnover.
And do not copy your ISO 27001 Statement of Applicability: the 38 Annex A controls of 42001 are spread across 9 domains and are about artificial intelligence, not information security.
What this work looks like inside.
Map your context
Processes, scope and whatever you already have written. Half-finished documents are reused, not discarded.
Measure the gap
Requirement by requirement of ISO/IEC 42001, with four states: compliant, in progress, gap, observation.
Draft and approve
Every document is born as a draft. A person approves it and the approval is recorded, as clause 7.5 requires.
Rehearse the audit
Stage 1 and Stage 2 rehearsals with findings written with criterion, evidence and statement, the way an auditor writes them.
The Ark of ISO's requirement catalogue uses its own curated interpretation of each clause. It never reproduces the literal text of the standard, which belongs to ISO and ICONTEC: to implement you need your licensed copy.
Frequently asked questions
Is it useful for an SME or only for big tech?
What is the AI system inventory?
Can it be integrated with ISO 27001?
How many controls does it have?
Same base, different catalogue.
All four share clauses 4 to 10. You document the base once and each standard's catalogue goes on top.
Next on the route, on the same base: ISO 14001, ISO 45001, ISO 37001 and ISO 22301. Adding them does not mean rebuilding the system.
Ready to set sail?
The 2026 pilot onboards one company at a time. Leave your email and we will write when your seat opens.